Found this
test from
Jahva's weblog, and yes it is perplexing. I think (hey, I was a religion minor in college):
1. Mahayana Buddhism (100%)
2. Neo-Pagan (91%)
3. Hinduism (88%)
4. New Age (86%)
5. Theravada Buddhism (84%)
6. Unitarian Universalism (82%)
7. Liberal Quakers (74%)
8. Jainism (72%)
9. Taoism (72%)
10. New Thought (64%)
11. Scientology (63%)
12. Sikhism (60%)
13. Orthodox Quaker (52%)
14. Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestants (51%)
15. Christian Science (Church of Christ, Scientist) (51%)
16. Secular Humanism (44%)
17. Reform Judaism (38%)
18. Bahá'í Faith (37%)
19. Orthodox Judaism (33%)
20. Seventh Day Adventist (31%)
21. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) (25%)
22. Eastern Orthodox (21%)
23. Islam (21%)
24. Roman Catholic (21%)
25. Mainline to Conservative Christian/Protestant (21%)
26. Jehovah's Witness (20%)
27. Nontheist (20%)
My brow furrows, why is anything around and below 50% showing up
at all?
My personal belief, in general, is that religion is language. Russians speak Russian because that's how they communicate, that's how they express and understand. Same with Japanese, English, French, all languages. If you want to know where the bathroom is, it's best if you know how to ask in the language of the country you're in.
The analogy isn't exact with religion, but it's sort of there for true seekers; people who aren't just following religious tenets because they have no mind of their own and need to be spoon-fed their beliefs (sorry, that came out much more condescending and patronizing than I'd ever intend it).
Buddhism is a language for me, I don't fancy pigeon-holing myself as a Buddhist, but the language that Buddhism uses is what resonated with me. I was sent to Sunday school growing up, and nothing resonated. I was exposed to the JCC growing up, and nothing resonated with me. But when Buddhism was spoken to me, I was like, "yea, I can dig it yo!"
But the basic teaching is no different than any other "religious language". Much of what I agree with Christianity and Judaism and other "religions", I just have to translate into Buddhist concepts, and if you look, you'll find them there. They're just clothed and veiled in different languages, different cultures, different geographic locations.
In college, I ran into a brick wall with Zen Buddhism, so I ended up in Islam classes, and I was blown away. The writings associated with Sufism (mystical branch of Islam), to me, were explaining the mechanics of Zen Buddhist concepts, which when explained in Zen Buddhist language is abstract and supposed to be intuitive, and as such, not very helpful. (
mushin:
no mind: ooh, yea, I get it man,
empty your mind, that's what we're supposed to be striving for, man. Give me a fucking break, please explain emptying your fucking mind).
What my ground-floor thesis is, is that religion is personal, but there are gradients in which we can find communities to help us find our own way. There is a large umbrella of Christianity, of Islam, of Judaism, of Hinduism, of Buddhism, etc. But then each of these umbrellas are broken down into sects because not everyone agrees with everyone else. But then these sects can be broken down into subsects because not everyone agrees with everyone else. Keep doing that.
Keep doing that until you get to the individuals and try to find two people with the
exact same religious belief. It can happen, but my "thesis" states that in most cases, there will be some point on which any two people will disagree with. Each and every person has their own religion.
OK, I'm officially drunk. Oooommmmmm. Ooooommmm. I see editing in my future. Ooooommmm. (no nothing is sacred)